From A to Ultra: How the M2 Pro and M2 Max stack up to every other Apple chip

At the heart of every Apple device is an Apple processor. Apple has been using its own chips in its iPhones and iPads for some time, while the Mac lineup has nearly completed its transition away from Intel chips. Apple has far more devices with its own silicon than Intel’s now—all that remains is the Mac Pro—and before the end of 2023, every product Apple makes will likely be powered by a home-grown chip.

What’s remarkable about Apple silicon is its performance and power efficiency. But all chips aren’t created equally. Understanding the performance differences between each chip will help with your buying decisions, especially when you’re deciding between iPhone 14 or MacBook models. Knowing how each chip performs gives you a better idea of what products to buy and whether or not it’s worth your money to step up to a higher model.

Let’s take a look at how the new processors compare with the rest of the processors in the iPhone, iPad, and Mac lineup and see how each performs and what that means to you. For the sake of consistency, we’ve used Geekbench 5 benchmarks. Here’s every chip and how the benchmarks compare with each other.

Updated 3/3/23 with Geekbench 6 scores. To see these scores, click the pop-up menu under the title of each chart.

Every processor compared

Before we get into the individual processors, let’s let the chips fall where they may. We’ve only included chips in Apple devices that are still for sale and it’s a somewhat predictable chart, with the fastest Mac chips at the top, followed by a mix of iPads and iPhones. But there are still some fascinating results: Owners of the iPad Pro can say their tablet is about as fast as a MacBook Air and that wouldn’t be an exaggeration. And the difference between the $399 iPhone SE and the $899 iPhone 14 isn’t as huge as their price difference indicates.

Read about how Apple’s M1 and M2 processors compare to Intel in our Mac processor guide.

iPhone processors

Let’s take a look at the specifications so we can understand the differences between them.

Processor	Performance cores	Efficiency cores	Graphics cores	Neural Engine	Memory	Transistors	Thermal Design Power	Devices
A16 Bionic	2 at 3.46GHz	4 at 2.02GHz	5	16-core	8GB	16 billion	6W	iPhone 14 Pro
A15 Bionic	2 at 3.22GHz	4 at 1.82GHz	5	16-core	8GB	15 billion	6W	iPhone 14
A15 Bionic	2 at 3.22GHz	4 at 1.82GHz	4	16-core	8GB	15 billion	6W	iPhone 13, iPhone SE
A14 Bionic	2 at 3.1 GHz	4 at 1.8GHz	4	16-core	6GB	11.8 billion	6W	iPhone 12

Now let’s look at how each processor performs. Not surprisingly, the A16 Bionic in the iPhone 14 Pro is the fastest. The iPhone 14 and iPhone 13 both have an A15 Bionic processor, but the iPhone 13 has one fewer GPU core than the iPhone 13 Pro, which gives it better graphics performance.

Apple still sells the iPhone 12, which has an A14 Bionic. It’s actually not much slower than the iPhone 13’s A15 Bionic–the specs between the two processors are practically the same, with the A15 Bionic’s performance cores having a slightly faster clock speed and more RAM. If price is the main priority over the camera and other features, consider the iPhone 12 instead of the iPhone 13.

The speed difference is more obvious between the iPhone 12’s A14 Bionic and the chips in the iPhone 14 models. This could be the last hurrah for the A14 Bionic since the iPhone 12 will be replaced by the 13 as the low-cost option with Apple’s next major iPhone rollout next fall, though it’s possible it makes its way into the next Apple TV revision.

iPad processors

The staggered release of Apple’s iPad lineup creates an odd-looking performance order of CPU and its device.

Processor	Performance cores	Efficiency cores	Graphics cores	Neural Engine	Memory	Transistors	Thermal Design Power	Devices
M2	4 at 3.49GHz	4 at 2.06GHz	10	16-core	8GB	20 billion	15W	12.9″ & 11″ iPad Pro
M1	4 at 3.2GHz	4 at 2.06GHz	8	16-core	8GB	16 billion	14W	iPad Air
A15 Bionic	2 at 2.93GHz	4 at 1.82GHz	5	16-core	8GB	15 billion	6W	iPad mini
A14 Bionic	2 at 3.1GHz	4 at 1.8GHz	4	16-core	6GB	11.8 billion	6W	iPad (10th gen)
A13 Bionic	2 at 2.66GHz	4 at 1.6GHz	4	8-core	4GB	8.5 billion	6W	iPad (9th gen)

The M2-equipped iPad Pros are the fastest models, and the gap between them and the iPad and iPad mini is significant. Furthermore, the M2 is 15 percent faster than the M1 that it replaced in the previous iPad Pros and is in the current iPad Air.

The new 10th-gen iPad that was released in the fall of 2022 has an A14 Bionic, an upgrade from the A13 Bionic in the previous model. Apple says the new 10th-gen iPad offers a 20 percent CPU boost and a 10 percent graphics increase.

Mac processors

With Apple’s M-series of chips for the Mac, the company’s release schedule involves the base version in the MacBook Air, 13-inch MacBook Pro, and other Macs. Apple then modifies it to create higher-end versions. Read about how the M2 compared to the M1 Pro and M1 Max.

The latest M-Series chip is the M2, which was released with the new 13-inch MacBook Pro and the MacBook Air in the summer of 2022, right after WWDC. The M2 replaces the M1 in those Macs, but Apple may keep around M1 models to offer as low-cost options, such as the $999 M1 MacBook Air. In January 2023, Apple released the M2 Pro in the 14- and 16-inch MacBook Pro and Mac mini, and M2 Max in the 14- and 16-inch MacBook Pro along with an M2 Mac mini.

Processor	Performance cores	Efficiency cores	Graphics cores	Neural Engine	Base memory	Transistors	Thermal Design Power	Device
M2 Max	8 at 3.49GHz	4 at 2.4GHz	38	16-core	32GB	67 billion	30W	14″ & 16″ MacBook Pro
M2 Max	8 at 3.49GHz	4 at 2.4GHz	30	16-core	32GB	67 billion	30W	14″ & 16″ MacBook Pro
M2 Pro	8 at 3.49GHz	4 at 2.4GHz	19	16-core	16GB	40 billion	30W	14″ & 16″ MacBook Pro
M2 Pro	6 at 3.49GHz	4 at 2.4GHz	16	16-core	16GB	40 billion	30W	14″ MacBook Pro
M2	4 at 3.49GHz	4 at 2.4GHz	10	16-core	8GB	20 billion	15W	13″ MacBook Pro, MacBook Air
M2	4 at 3.49GHz	4 at 2.4GHz	8	16-core	8GB	20 billion	15W	MacBook Air
M1 Ultra	16 at 3.2GHz	4 at 2.06GHz	64	32-core	64GB	114 billion	60W	Mac Studio
M1 Ultra	16 at 3.2GHz	4 at 2.06GHz	48	32-core	64GB	114 billion	60W	Mac Studio
M1 Max	8 at 3.2GHz	2 at 2.06GHz	32	16-core	32GB	57 billion	30W	Mac Studio
M1 Max	8 at 3.2GHz	2 at 2.06GHz	24	16-core	32GB	57 billion	30W	Mac Studio
M1	4 at 3.2GHz	4 at 2.06GHz	8	16-core	8GB	16 billion	14W	MacBook Air, 24″ iMac
M1	4 at 3.2GHz	4 at 2.06GHz	7	16-core	8GB	16 billion	14W	MacBook Air, 24″ iMac

With the M2, Apple claims an 18 percent improvement in general CPU performance over the M1. In the multi-core CPU test, we are able to confirm Apple’s claim. The single-core CPU test showed a lower 13 percent increase for the M2. With the M2 Pro and M2 Max, Apple claims a 20 percent boost over the M1 Pro (which is no longer in any current Mac) and the M2 Max.

The M1 Ultra is a beast of a chip, doubling the CPU multi-core performance of the M1 Max, which has half as many CPU cores. It blazes in GPU performance, too. There’s no word on when Apple will release an M2 Ultra, but it will most likely debut in the upcoming Mac Pro.

Apple’s Max chips have the same CPU configuration as the Plus versions; the key difference is the GPU. The Max can have double the GPU cores as the Plus, so its graphics performance is much improved.

The chip that started it all, the good ol’ M1, may seem slow compared to Apple’s more current chips—but that’s not to undermine Apple’s original Mac processor. Remember, the M1 blows past the Intel processors it replaced, resulting in a significant price/performance value.